 |
Back the Badge
Return to Home Page
|
|||
| Home | Articles | Book Page | Links | Mike's Corner | Search | Studies | Contact Us | |||
| Summary and Conclusion | |||
| It's been noted that criminals don't like 3-Strikes and think it is unfair. Many criminals think it's so unfair that they have left California. | |||
| Some families of criminals have been able to organize and are working hard to undo 3-Strikes and get their relatives out of prison. They have taken on the posture of a victims' organization. They have made the 3-Strike battle cry, "25 to life for stealing a slice of pizza?" while making little or no mention of the fact that 2 prior convictions for serious or violent crimes must also be considered. | |||
| This begs the question - "Should we make laws that criminals and their families like?" | |||
| I would suggest this is how we got into this situation to begin with. | |||
| Keep in mind that no matter how many prior convictions or how violent a criminal's past is, to avoid 3-Strikes all they have to do is stop doing crime, and many have. | |||
| Respectfully submitted, | |||
|
|||
| Mike Reynolds | |||
| Proposition 184 | |||
| "Three Strikes and You're Out" | |||
| Click here to view the 11 criminal case histories that were included with the original report. | |||
Back the Badge Return to Home Page |